The strange request for a mosquito net loan
CRITICS continued to follow the federal government’s controversial plan to spend $ 200 million, or more than 82 billion naira, on the purchase of mosquito nets and ancillary drugs to fight malaria in 13 of the 36 states of the federation. .
The disapproval of this unusual proposal by many Nigerians is not only based on the colossal amount of money to be spent on what amounts to frivolity under the circumstances, but also on the fact that the government is considering taking out a foreign loan to make the purchase since he doesn’t have the money. Why is the purchase of mosquito nets so critical at this time that the country must
to increase its already colossal stock of foreign loans? Yes, malaria is still a disease that poses a serious threat to the health of many Nigerians, but they have always found ways around it, and there are no urgent or new indications of extraordinary exacerbation or serious illness-related health problems to warrant borrowing. buy mosquito nets right now. In addition, advocacy for the fight against malaria all over the world makes mosquito nets free. Even local philanthropists and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) distribute mosquito nets for free. Indeed, there is almost an overabundance of mosquito nets in the country.
And assuming, but not admitting, that there is a compelling need for bed nets in the country, why can’t the government use its goodwill to attract local and international donors to help fill any gaps? Given the commitment and dedication of many of these donors to their causes, as evidenced by the intense advocacy often given to the distribution of free mosquito nets, it is reasonable to assume that many of them would gladly partner with them. government to distribute free mosquito nets. Why does the government not explore this option, especially when it does not have the resources to obtain the mosquito nets, that leaves much to be desired. And anyway, what happens to the 450 million naira that would have been budgeted to fight against malaria in the 2022 budget bill? Is there an unclean motive behind buying mosquito nets using debt capital? Isn’t it fun and curious that ânot to be soldâ is always printed on the nets, when they are readily available for sale in the market?
Why does this government seem to have a frenzied predilection for loans? Does this mean good for the country? And if the government is to appease its apparent penchant for borrowing, why has it not provided for local production of mosquito nets so that at least the colossal sum to be borrowed circulates through the country’s economic system? Why should the government agree to an arrangement that gives the creditor disproportionate leeway to dictate how and on what to spend the loan, and perhaps with foreign net suppliers? How will the country benefit most from the planned foreign loan when almost all of it will be
to be pumped to foreign economies by subterfuge?
The World Health Organization (WHO) has just approved the first vaccine against malaria. The hype around this important breakthrough may not be that high
diseases of global concern, but countries in the tropics like Nigeria where malaria is most prevalent should seriously consider
vaccinate their citizens instead of borrowing to buy mosquito nets. The plan to borrow to buy mosquito nets is strange and amounts to a serious shift in priority which casts it in the mold of an administration that is not serious or serious about good governance. And with this quirk, how will the international community now look at Nigeria and how would other world leaders view their colleague who could not set his priorities correctly?
We applaud the Senate for questioning queer lending, especially its purpose. In the current circumstances, it is unreasonable to increase the country’s already worrying external debt
in order to fight against malaria, especially if the intention is not to stimulate the local production of mosquito nets and auxiliary therapies to fight against the disease.